P.V. NAUDIA TARHAR EAST PART PS 7
DR. AJAY KUMAR
BSPBAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY137 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 137 | 39.48% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 122 | 35.16% | |
| 3 | AJAY | SP | 48 | 13.83% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 3.17% | |
| 5 | MANJU SANT | INC | 11 | 3.17% | |
| 6 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 7 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 8 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 9 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 12 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 13 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.29% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 347 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 137 | 39.48% | 1 | 27 | Average |
| ADS | 122 | 35.16% | 2 | 349 | Average |
| SP | 48 | 13.83% | 3 | 391 | Weak |
| NOTA | 11 | 3.17% | 5 | 53 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 3.17% | 4 | 88 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 2.59% | 6 | 126 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 1.15% | 7 | 65 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.58% | 8 | 228 | Poor |
| ABSP | 1 | 0.29% | 9 | 285 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.29% | 10 | 250 | Poor |
| PPID | 1 | 0.29% | 11 | 366 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.