JAWAHAR LAL J.H. SCHOOL IRADATGANJ ROOM N. 1 PS 53
AJAY
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY455 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY | SP | 455 | 71.99% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 131 | 20.73% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 24 | 3.80% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 1.58% | |
| 5 | MANJU SANT | INC | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 632 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 455 | 71.99% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| ADS | 131 | 20.73% | 2 | 339 | Weak |
| BSP | 24 | 3.80% | 3 | 273 | Poor |
| NOTA | 10 | 1.58% | 4 | 76 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.63% | 5 | 256 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 220 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 233 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.32% | 8 | 349 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 262 | Poor |
| PPID | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 370 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 341 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.