P.V. TATARGANJ WEST PART PS 39
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)184 votes at this polling station
over DR. AJAY KUMAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 184 | 43.09% | |
| 2 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 141 | 33.02% | |
| 3 | AJAY | SP | 59 | 13.82% | |
| 4 | MANJU SANT | INC | 12 | 2.81% | |
| 5 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 12 | 2.81% | |
| 6 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 7 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 10 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 427 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 184 | 43.09% | 1 | 255 | Strong |
| BSP | 141 | 33.02% | 2 | 22 | Average |
| SP | 59 | 13.82% | 3 | 387 | Weak |
| PPID | 12 | 2.81% | 5 | 40 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 2.81% | 4 | 78 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 2.11% | 6 | 129 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.94% | 7 | 102 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.70% | 8 | 310 | Poor |
| JKP | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 169 | Poor |
| ABSP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 290 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.