P.V. PIPRAHATA ROOM N. 2 PS 370
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)175 votes at this polling station
over DR. AJAY KUMAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 175 | 41.77% | |
| 2 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 159 | 37.95% | |
| 3 | AJAY | SP | 57 | 13.60% | |
| 4 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 11 | 2.63% | |
| 5 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 6 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 8 | MANJU SANT | INC | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 10 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 419 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 175 | 41.77% | 1 | 277 | Strong |
| BSP | 159 | 37.95% | 2 | 12 | Average |
| SP | 57 | 13.60% | 3 | 388 | Weak |
| PPID | 11 | 2.63% | 4 | 63 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.67% | 5 | 220 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.72% | 6 | 220 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.48% | 7 | 278 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.48% | 8 | 363 | Poor |
| JKP | 2 | 0.48% | 9 | 241 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 389 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 395 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.