P.V. KUKHUDI EAST PART PS 357
DR. AJAY KUMAR
BSPBAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY306 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 306 | 43.47% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 251 | 35.65% | |
| 3 | AJAY | SP | 120 | 17.05% | |
| 4 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 5 | 0.71% | |
| 5 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | MANJU SANT | INC | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 704 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 306 | 43.47% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| ADS | 251 | 35.65% | 2 | 145 | Average |
| SP | 120 | 17.05% | 3 | 302 | Weak |
| IND | 6 | 0.85% | 4 | 248 | Poor |
| PPID | 5 | 0.71% | 5 | 237 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.57% | 7 | 147 | Poor |
| ABSP | 4 | 0.57% | 6 | 134 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.43% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 375 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 213 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.