P.V. MAVAIYA TA. BALAPUR NORTH PART PS 348
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)164 votes at this polling station
over AJAY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 164 | 32.22% | |
| 2 | AJAY | SP | 141 | 27.70% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 125 | 24.56% | |
| 4 | MANJU SANT | INC | 46 | 9.04% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 1.96% | |
| 6 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 8 | 1.57% | |
| 7 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 509 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 164 | 32.22% | 1 | 299 | Average |
| SP | 141 | 27.70% | 2 | 266 | Average |
| BSP | 125 | 24.56% | 3 | 39 | Weak |
| INC | 46 | 9.04% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| NOTA | 10 | 1.96% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| PPID | 8 | 1.57% | 7 | 131 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.57% | 6 | 189 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.59% | 8 | 216 | Poor |
| JKP | 2 | 0.39% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 322 | Poor |
| ABSP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.