P.V. MAJHIGAVA ROOM N. 1 PS 329
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)183 votes at this polling station
over AJAY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 183 | 43.16% | |
| 2 | AJAY | SP | 181 | 42.69% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 21 | 4.95% | |
| 4 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 8 | 1.89% | |
| 5 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 6 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 8 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 9 | MANJU SANT | INC | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 10 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 11 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 13 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 1 | 0.24% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 424 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 183 | 43.16% | 1 | 259 | Strong |
| SP | 181 | 42.69% | 2 | 188 | Strong |
| BSP | 21 | 4.95% | 3 | 288 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.83% | 4 | 72 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.89% | 5 | 20 | Poor |
| PPID | 6 | 1.42% | 6 | 187 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.94% | 7 | 300 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.71% | 8 | 317 | Poor |
| JKP | 3 | 0.71% | 9 | 152 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.47% | 10 | 281 | Poor |
| ABSP | 1 | 0.24% | 11 | 344 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.