RANJEET PANDIT I.CO. LOHGARA ROOM N. 1 PS 193
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)196 votes at this polling station
over AJAY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 196 | 46.23% | |
| 2 | AJAY | SP | 120 | 28.30% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 70 | 16.51% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 9 | 2.12% | |
| 5 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 6 | MANJU SANT | INC | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 7 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 8 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 9 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 10 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 11 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 424 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 196 | 46.23% | 1 | 233 | Strong |
| SP | 120 | 28.30% | 2 | 301 | Average |
| BSP | 70 | 16.51% | 3 | 130 | Weak |
| NOTA | 9 | 2.12% | 4 | 101 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 1.42% | 5 | 51 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.18% | 7 | 271 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.18% | 8 | 233 | Poor |
| ABSP | 5 | 1.18% | 6 | 69 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.71% | 9 | 115 | Poor |
| PPID | 3 | 0.71% | 10 | 306 | Poor |
| JKP | 2 | 0.47% | 11 | 206 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.