P.V. CHHATAHARA GHURETHA ROOM N. 1 PS 19
AJAY
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY343 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY | SP | 343 | 69.01% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 63 | 12.68% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 45 | 9.05% | |
| 4 | MANJU SANT | INC | 14 | 2.82% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.61% | |
| 6 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 5 | 1.01% | |
| 8 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 10 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 11 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 12 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 13 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 497 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 343 | 69.01% | 1 | 33 | Strong |
| ADS | 63 | 12.68% | 2 | 389 | Weak |
| BSP | 45 | 9.05% | 3 | 193 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 2.82% | 4 | 51 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.21% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.61% | 6 | 112 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.01% | 7 | 41 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.60% | 8 | 159 | Poor |
| PPID | 3 | 0.60% | 9 | 285 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.40% | 10 | 211 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 344 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.