RAJKIYA BALIKA INTER CO. SHANKARGARH ROOM N. 5 PS 172
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)265 votes at this polling station
over AJAY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 265 | 69.19% | |
| 2 | AJAY | SP | 84 | 21.93% | |
| 3 | MANJU SANT | INC | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 4 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 6 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 5 | 1.31% | |
| 7 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 4 | 1.04% | |
| 8 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 10 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 383 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 265 | 69.19% | 1 | 126 | Strong |
| SP | 84 | 21.93% | 2 | 354 | Weak |
| AAP | 6 | 1.57% | 3 | 34 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.57% | 4 | 193 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.57% | 5 | 194 | Poor |
| ABSP | 5 | 1.31% | 6 | 67 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 1.04% | 7 | 388 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.78% | 8 | 327 | Poor |
| PPID | 2 | 0.52% | 9 | 340 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.26% | 11 | 297 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.