PU.MA.J.HA. SCHOOL BAGHALA MADANPUR EAST PART PS 139
AJAY
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY270 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY | SP | 270 | 45.92% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 230 | 39.12% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 36 | 6.12% | |
| 4 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 9 | 1.53% | |
| 5 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 9 | 1.53% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 7 | MANJU SANT | INC | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 8 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 5 | 0.85% | |
| 9 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 5 | 0.85% | |
| 10 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 11 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 12 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 13 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 588 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 270 | 45.92% | 1 | 66 | Strong |
| ADS | 230 | 39.12% | 2 | 175 | Average |
| BSP | 36 | 6.12% | 3 | 231 | Poor |
| IND | 18 | 3.06% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| PPID | 9 | 1.53% | 5 | 87 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.19% | 7 | 155 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.19% | 6 | 169 | Poor |
| ABSP | 5 | 0.85% | 8 | 60 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.68% | 9 | 118 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.34% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.