P.V. GOISARA WEST PART PS 125
AJAY
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY204 votes at this polling station
over VACHASPATI (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY | SP | 204 | 43.22% | |
| 2 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 133 | 28.18% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 100 | 21.19% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 12 | 2.54% | |
| 5 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 6 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 7 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | MANJU SANT | INC | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 472 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 204 | 43.22% | 1 | 157 | Strong |
| ADS | 133 | 28.18% | 2 | 336 | Average |
| BSP | 100 | 21.19% | 3 | 71 | Weak |
| NOTA | 12 | 2.54% | 4 | 43 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.69% | 5 | 175 | Poor |
| PPID | 5 | 1.06% | 6 | 209 | Poor |
| ABSP | 4 | 0.85% | 7 | 106 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.64% | 8 | 298 | Poor |
| JKP | 2 | 0.42% | 9 | 190 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 263 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.