P.V. PANDAR ROOM N. 3 PS 105
VACHASPATI
ADSAPNA DAL (SONEYLAL)188 votes at this polling station
over AJAY (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VACHASPATI | ADS | 188 | 36.86% | |
| 2 | AJAY | SP | 154 | 30.20% | |
| 3 | DR. AJAY KUMAR | BSP | 95 | 18.63% | |
| 4 | MANJU SANT | INC | 24 | 4.71% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 12 | 2.35% | |
| 6 | RAM KUMAR VIDYARTHI | PPID | 11 | 2.16% | |
| 7 | SUMITRA VARUN | ABSP | 9 | 1.76% | |
| 8 | AYODHYA PRASAD KOL | CPI | 8 | 1.57% | |
| 9 | AJEET BHASKAR | IND | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 10 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | VIVEK KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | KANHAIYA LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | RAVITA DEVI | JKP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 510 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 188 | 36.86% | 1 | 249 | Average |
| SP | 154 | 30.20% | 2 | 236 | Average |
| BSP | 95 | 18.63% | 3 | 85 | Weak |
| INC | 24 | 4.71% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| NOTA | 12 | 2.35% | 5 | 41 | Poor |
| PPID | 11 | 2.16% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| ABSP | 9 | 1.76% | 7 | 7 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.57% | 8 | 21 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.57% | 9 | 172 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 256 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 264, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.