PANCHAYAT BHAWAN DILIPCHANDPUR PS 352

AC 258 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

HAKIM LAL BIND

SPSamajvadi Party

288 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

93 16.9 pp

votes

over PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH RAHUL (NISHA)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors926

Total turnout551votes cast at this station

Turnout %59.5% of this booth's roll

Male electors265

Female electors286

Vote share in this booth

of 551 votes counted

SP 52.3% NISHA 35.4% AAP 5.3% IND 2.2% BSP 2.0% IND 0.9% PMSP 0.7% IND 0.4% IN 0.4% ABSP 0.4% JAP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	HAKIM LAL BIND	SP	288	52.27%
2	PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH RAHUL	NISHA	195	35.39%
3	PAWAN KUMAR TIWARI	AAP	29	5.26%
4	LAL SAHAB	IND	12	2.18%
5	NARENDRA KUMAR URF MUNNA TRIPATHI	BSP	11	2.00%
6	RAJ BAHADUR	IND	5	0.91%
7	MADAN CHANDRA	PMSP	4	0.73%
8	RAVI DHAR TRIPATHI	IND	2	0.36%
9	REENA KUMARI BIND	IN	2	0.36%
10	AVANISH KUMAR	ABSP	2	0.36%
11	GULAB CHANDRA	JAP	1	0.18%
12	SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 551 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

9 parties · AC 258

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	288	52.27%	1	81	Strong
NISHA	195	35.39%	2	187	Average
AAP	29	5.26%	3	4	Poor
IND	19	3.45%	4	27	Poor
BSP	11	2.00%	5	387	Poor
PMSP	4	0.73%	6	90	Poor
IN	2	0.36%	8	293	Poor
ABSP	2	0.36%	7	245	Poor
JAP	1	0.18%	9	321	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 258, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.