PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA KATHVAR PARVEJPUR DAKSHINI BHAG-1 PS 99
Geeta Shastri (Pasi)
SPSamajwadi Party353 votes at this polling station
over Anand Bharti (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geeta Shastri (Pasi) | SP | 353 | 75.75% | |
| 2 | Anand Bharti | BSP | 52 | 11.16% | |
| 3 | Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj | ADS | 40 | 8.58% | |
| 4 | Rakesh Kumar | LSP | 7 | 1.50% | |
| 5 | Sudhir Kumar | JDL | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 6 | Sita Ram | AIMEI | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Pradeep Kumar Jatav | API | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar Pasi | INC | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | Anil Kumar Gautam | ASPKR | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | Lallan | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Rakesh Kumar Gautam | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | Ratnesh Kumar Chaudhari | PSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 466 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 353 | 74.79% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| BSP | 52 | 11.02% | 2 | 213 | Weak |
| ADS | 40 | 8.47% | 3 | 421 | Poor |
| LSP | 7 | 1.48% | 4 | 3 | Poor |
| JDL | 4 | 0.85% | 5 | 81 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.42% | 9 | 320 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.42% | 6 | 288 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 240 | Poor |
| API | 2 | 0.42% | 8 | 188 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 268 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 304 | Poor |
| PSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 393 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 255, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.