PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA MAUDOSTPUR PS 71
Geeta Shastri (Pasi)
SPSamajwadi Party179 votes at this polling station
over Sita Ram (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geeta Shastri (Pasi) | SP | 179 | 52.49% | |
| 2 | Sita Ram | AIMEI | 57 | 16.72% | |
| 3 | Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj | ADS | 51 | 14.96% | |
| 4 | Anand Bharti | BSP | 46 | 13.49% | |
| 5 | Lallan | AAP | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | Manoj Kumar Pasi | INC | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 7 | Anil Kumar Gautam | ASPKR | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | Pradeep Kumar Jatav | API | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | Ratnesh Kumar Chaudhari | PSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rakesh Kumar | LSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sudhir Kumar | JDL | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Rakesh Kumar Gautam | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 341 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 179 | 51.88% | 1 | 250 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 57 | 16.52% | 2 | 26 | Weak |
| ADS | 51 | 14.78% | 3 | 411 | Weak |
| BSP | 46 | 13.33% | 4 | 245 | Weak |
| AAP | 3 | 0.87% | 5 | 89 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.58% | 6 | 283 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.58% | 7 | 315 | Poor |
| API | 1 | 0.29% | 8 | 289 | Poor |
| JDL | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 373 | Poor |
| LSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 345 | Poor |
| PSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 388 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 398 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 255, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.