KANYA POORVA MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA MAUAIMA BHAG 1 PS 50
Geeta Shastri (Pasi)
SPSamajwadi Party342 votes at this polling station
over Anand Bharti (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geeta Shastri (Pasi) | SP | 342 | 59.48% | |
| 2 | Anand Bharti | BSP | 114 | 19.83% | |
| 3 | Sita Ram | AIMEI | 64 | 11.13% | |
| 4 | Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj | ADS | 42 | 7.30% | |
| 5 | Anil Kumar Gautam | ASPKR | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 6 | Rakesh Kumar | LSP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | Lallan | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar Pasi | INC | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 9 | Pradeep Kumar Jatav | API | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Sudhir Kumar | JDL | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Rakesh Kumar Gautam | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Ratnesh Kumar Chaudhari | PSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 575 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 342 | 58.97% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| BSP | 114 | 19.66% | 2 | 75 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 64 | 11.03% | 3 | 20 | Weak |
| ADS | 42 | 7.24% | 4 | 419 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 4 | 0.69% | 5 | 157 | Poor |
| LSP | 3 | 0.52% | 6 | 65 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 157 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.34% | 8 | 308 | Poor |
| JDL | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 242 | Poor |
| API | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 389 | Poor |
| PSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 255, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.