JANTA INTER COLLEGE UTTARI MADYA BHAG-2 PS 43
Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)265 votes at this polling station
over Geeta Shastri (Pasi) (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj | ADS | 265 | 60.78% | |
| 2 | Geeta Shastri (Pasi) | SP | 100 | 22.94% | |
| 3 | Anand Bharti | BSP | 47 | 10.78% | |
| 4 | Sita Ram | AIMEI | 13 | 2.98% | |
| 5 | Anil Kumar Gautam | ASPKR | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | Lallan | AAP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Sudhir Kumar | JDL | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Rakesh Kumar Gautam | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | Manoj Kumar Pasi | INC | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Pradeep Kumar Jatav | API | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Ratnesh Kumar Chaudhari | PSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Rakesh Kumar | LSP | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 436 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 265 | 60.36% | 1 | 106 | Strong |
| SP | 100 | 22.78% | 2 | 396 | Weak |
| BSP | 47 | 10.71% | 3 | 241 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 13 | 2.96% | 4 | 102 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.68% | 5 | 212 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 156 | Poor |
| API | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 278 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 290 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 384 | Poor |
| JDL | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 240 | Poor |
| LSP | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 204 | Poor |
| PSP | 1 | 0.23% | 12 | 263 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 255, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.