POORVA MADYAMIK VIDYALAYA MAHRAUNDA UTTARI MADYA BHAG-1 PS 14
Geeta Shastri (Pasi)
SPSamajwadi Party204 votes at this polling station
over Anand Bharti (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geeta Shastri (Pasi) | SP | 204 | 42.06% | |
| 2 | Anand Bharti | BSP | 160 | 32.99% | |
| 3 | Dr. Jamuna Prasad Saroj | ADS | 53 | 10.93% | |
| 4 | Sita Ram | AIMEI | 40 | 8.25% | |
| 5 | Manoj Kumar Pasi | INC | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 6 | Sudhir Kumar | JDL | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 7 | Rakesh Kumar Gautam | IND | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | Anil Kumar Gautam | ASPKR | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 9 | Pradeep Kumar Jatav | API | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 10 | Ratnesh Kumar Chaudhari | PSP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | Rakesh Kumar | LSP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | Lallan | AAP | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 485 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 204 | 41.21% | 1 | 194 | Strong |
| BSP | 160 | 32.32% | 2 | 26 | Average |
| ADS | 53 | 10.71% | 3 | 407 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 40 | 8.08% | 4 | 36 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.41% | 5 | 58 | Poor |
| JDL | 6 | 1.21% | 6 | 45 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.81% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| API | 3 | 0.61% | 9 | 105 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.61% | 8 | 206 | Poor |
| LSP | 2 | 0.40% | 10 | 112 | Poor |
| PSP | 2 | 0.40% | 11 | 160 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 244 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 255, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.