3 PS 2
HUMAIRA AKHTAR
COL 545455 votes at this polling station
over MUJFAFAR KHAN (COL 51)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUMAIRA AKHTAR | COL 54 | 55 | 14.36% | |
| 2 | MUJFAFAR KHAN | COL 51 | 52 | 13.58% | |
| 3 | DUSHYANT SINGH | COL 48 | 49 | 12.79% | |
| 4 | OMKAR SINGH | COL 45 | 46 | 12.01% | |
| 5 | MOHD ASLAM URF PASHA | COL 42 | 43 | 11.23% | |
| 6 | RAISUDDIN | COL 39 | 40 | 10.44% | |
| 7 | TRILOK CHANDRA | COL 27 | 28 | 7.31% | |
| 8 | RAJESH KUMAR SINGH URF CHUNNU | COL 21 | 22 | 5.74% | |
| 9 | KAMAL AKHTAR | COL 18 | 19 | 4.96% | |
| 10 | MOHD ISRAR | COL 15 | 16 | 4.18% | |
| 11 | AFAQ ALI KHAN | COL 12 | 13 | 3.39% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 383 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 54 | 55 | 687.50% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 51 | 52 | 650.00% | 2 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 48 | 49 | 612.50% | 3 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 45 | 46 | 575.00% | 4 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 42 | 43 | 537.50% | 5 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 39 | 40 | 500.00% | 6 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 27 | 28 | 350.00% | 7 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 22 | 275.00% | 8 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 19 | 237.50% | 9 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 16 | 200.00% | 10 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 13 | 162.50% | 11 | 1 | Strong |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 25, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.