P.M.V. SARAY BHIMSEN (PARSANI) K.S. 2 PS 379
RAM SINGH
COL 1818305 votes at this polling station
over RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM SINGH | COL 18 | 305 | 84.25% | |
| 2 | RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI | COL 15 | 32 | 8.84% | |
| 3 | FULCHANDRA | COL 12 | 18 | 4.97% | |
| 4 | RAM ABHILASH | COL 36 | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 5 | SUNITA | COL 21 | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 6 | None of the Above | COL 42 | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | KAUSHALENDRA PANDEY | COL 39 | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | AJAY YADAV | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | NAND LAL | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MUJAMMIL HUSSAIN | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rajmani | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 362 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 305 | 84.25% | 1 | 145 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 32 | 8.84% | 2 | 412 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 18 | 4.97% | 3 | 323 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 2 | 0.55% | 5 | 228 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 2 | 0.55% | 4 | 329 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.55% | 6 | 304 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 303 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 393 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 388 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 403 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 400 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 249, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.