P.M.V. SONAHI K.S. 2 PS 365
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI
COL 1515186 votes at this polling station
over RAM SINGH (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI | COL 15 | 186 | 75.92% | |
| 2 | RAM SINGH | COL 18 | 34 | 13.88% | |
| 3 | FULCHANDRA | COL 12 | 18 | 7.35% | |
| 4 | None of the Above | COL 42 | 2 | 0.82% | |
| 5 | SUNITA | COL 21 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 6 | AJAY YADAV | COL 24 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | MUJAMMIL HUSSAIN | COL 30 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | RAM ABHILASH | COL 36 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | KAUSHALENDRA PANDEY | COL 39 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | Rajmani | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | NAND LAL | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 245 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 186 | 75.92% | 1 | 217 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 34 | 13.88% | 2 | 418 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 18 | 7.35% | 3 | 322 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.82% | 4 | 299 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 1 | 0.41% | 5 | 382 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.41% | 6 | 168 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.41% | 7 | 220 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.41% | 8 | 322 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.41% | 9 | 298 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 390 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 378 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 249, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.