PANCHAYAT BHAWAN PITHAPUR K.S.2 PS 290
RAM SINGH
COL 1818256 votes at this polling station
over RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM SINGH | COL 18 | 256 | 46.38% | |
| 2 | RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF MOTI | COL 15 | 186 | 33.70% | |
| 3 | FULCHANDRA | COL 12 | 94 | 17.03% | |
| 4 | SUNITA | COL 21 | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 5 | AJAY YADAV | COL 24 | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 6 | RAM ABHILASH | COL 36 | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 7 | NAND LAL | COL 27 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | None of the Above | COL 42 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | MUJAMMIL HUSSAIN | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rajmani | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAUSHALENDRA PANDEY | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 552 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 256 | 46.38% | 1 | 198 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 186 | 33.70% | 2 | 216 | Average |
| COL 12 | 94 | 17.03% | 3 | 62 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 8 | 1.45% | 4 | 23 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 0.54% | 5 | 15 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.54% | 6 | 130 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 121 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 366 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 362 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 351 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 389 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 249, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.