P.S. MIRIYA ROOM NO. 01 PS 67
RAGHURAJ PRATAP SINGH
COL 2727230 votes at this polling station
over GULSHAN YADAV (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAGHURAJ PRATAP SINGH | COL 27 | 230 | 46.56% | |
| 2 | GULSHAN YADAV | COL 12 | 217 | 43.93% | |
| 3 | SINDHUJA MISHRA SENANI | COL 21 | 19 | 3.85% | |
| 4 | DHARMARAJ | COL 24 | 10 | 2.02% | |
| 5 | MU PHAHEEM | COL 15 | 10 | 2.02% | |
| 6 | JAYESH SINGH | COL 30 | 4 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | YOGESH KUMAR | COL 18 | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 8 | DHIRENDRA KUMAR | COL 36 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | SEEMA | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | HARIVANSH KUMAR | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | TANVEER | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 494 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 27 | 230 | 45.82% | 1 | 208 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 217 | 43.23% | 2 | 105 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 19 | 3.78% | 3 | 288 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 10 | 1.99% | 5 | 43 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 10 | 1.99% | 4 | 103 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 4 | 0.80% | 6 | 119 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 3 | 0.60% | 7 | 43 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 130 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 256 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 349 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 290 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 246, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.