S.R.M.S.S. NARSINGHGARH PS 133
RAGHURAJ PRATAP SINGH
COL 2727203 votes at this polling station
over GULSHAN YADAV (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAGHURAJ PRATAP SINGH | COL 27 | 203 | 55.77% | |
| 2 | GULSHAN YADAV | COL 12 | 142 | 39.01% | |
| 3 | SINDHUJA MISHRA SENANI | COL 21 | 12 | 3.30% | |
| 4 | DHARMARAJ | COL 24 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 5 | MU PHAHEEM | COL 15 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | YOGESH KUMAR | COL 18 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | JAYESH SINGH | COL 30 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | DHIRENDRA KUMAR | COL 36 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | SEEMA | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | HARIVANSH KUMAR | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | TANVEER | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 364 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 27 | 203 | 55.16% | 1 | 237 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 142 | 38.59% | 2 | 237 | Average |
| COL 21 | 12 | 3.26% | 3 | 333 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 0.82% | 4 | 251 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 1 | 0.27% | 5 | 359 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 1 | 0.27% | 6 | 183 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.27% | 7 | 323 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.27% | 8 | 151 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 286 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 359 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 321 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 246, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.