P.S. SHIKARPUR PS 99
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP151 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 151 | 47.34% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 112 | 35.11% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 36 | 11.29% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 6 | 1.88% | |
| 5 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 7 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 319 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 151 | 46.60% | 1 | 273 | Strong |
| SP | 112 | 34.57% | 2 | 307 | Average |
| BSP | 36 | 11.11% | 3 | 235 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.85% | 4 | 241 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.85% | 5 | 299 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 1.23% | 6 | 49 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.93% | 7 | 277 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.31% | 8 | 153 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 274 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 261 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.