P.S. MANJHILGAON ROOM NO-1 PS 84
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP173 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 173 | 47.40% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 113 | 30.96% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 64 | 17.53% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 6 | 1.64% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 365 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 173 | 47.14% | 1 | 240 | Strong |
| BSP | 113 | 30.79% | 2 | 49 | Average |
| SP | 64 | 17.44% | 3 | 373 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.63% | 4 | 237 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 1.09% | 5 | 231 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.54% | 6 | 375 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.54% | 7 | 146 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.27% | 8 | 137 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 295 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 256 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.