P.S. SALEMPUR GOLI ROOM NO-2 PS 81
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP174 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 174 | 66.67% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 54 | 20.69% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 12 | 4.60% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 7 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.77% | |
| 9 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 261 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 174 | 65.66% | 1 | 238 | Strong |
| SP | 54 | 20.38% | 2 | 391 | Weak |
| BSP | 12 | 4.53% | 3 | 336 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.89% | 4 | 172 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.89% | 5 | 275 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.89% | 6 | 321 | Poor |
| SBU | 3 | 1.13% | 7 | 59 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.75% | 8 | 145 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.38% | 9 | 136 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 254 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.