P.S.BHOGLPUR ROOM NO-2 PS 8
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP199 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 199 | 43.93% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 127 | 28.04% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 105 | 23.18% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 453 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 199 | 43.45% | 1 | 194 | Strong |
| SP | 127 | 27.73% | 2 | 281 | Average |
| BSP | 105 | 22.93% | 3 | 58 | Weak |
| IND | 8 | 1.75% | 4 | 245 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.87% | 5 | 223 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.87% | 6 | 305 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.44% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 133 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 213 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.