P.S.BARKATPUR ROOM NO-2 PS 74
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP266 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 266 | 57.20% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 109 | 23.44% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 41 | 8.82% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 15 | 3.23% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 12 | 2.58% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 1.29% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 8 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.65% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.65% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.22% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 465 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 266 | 56.48% | 1 | 113 | Strong |
| SP | 109 | 23.14% | 2 | 313 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 8.70% | 3 | 212 | Poor |
| CPI | 15 | 3.18% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 3.18% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 2.55% | 6 | 93 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.64% | 7 | 86 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.42% | 8 | 71 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 151 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 137 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.