P.S. BUDWAN -II ROOM NO-03 PS 72
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP178 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 178 | 68.99% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 35 | 13.57% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 14 | 5.43% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 10 | 3.88% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 3.49% | |
| 6 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 7 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.78% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.39% | |
| 13 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.39% | |
| 14 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 258 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 178 | 68.20% | 1 | 232 | Strong |
| SP | 35 | 13.41% | 2 | 403 | Weak |
| BSP | 14 | 5.36% | 3 | 321 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 3.83% | 4 | 119 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 3.45% | 5 | 54 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 1.53% | 6 | 342 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 1.15% | 7 | 33 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.77% | 8 | 82 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.77% | 9 | 143 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.38% | 10 | 133 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.