P.S. BUDWAN ROOM NO-3 PS 69
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP436 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 436 | 65.96% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 117 | 17.70% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 51 | 7.72% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 11 | 1.66% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 8 | 1.21% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 8 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 9 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 11 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 661 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 436 | 63.84% | 1 | 8 | Strong |
| SP | 117 | 17.13% | 2 | 299 | Weak |
| BSP | 51 | 7.47% | 3 | 178 | Poor |
| IND | 25 | 3.66% | 4 | 25 | Poor |
| CPI | 11 | 1.61% | 5 | 25 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.17% | 6 | 167 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 0.88% | 7 | 13 | Poor |
| SBU | 5 | 0.73% | 8 | 28 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 66 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 262 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.