P.S. BUDWAN ROOM NO-1 PS 67
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP264 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 264 | 64.71% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 72 | 17.65% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 45 | 11.03% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.74% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.74% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 408 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 264 | 63.77% | 1 | 116 | Strong |
| BSP | 72 | 17.39% | 2 | 111 | Weak |
| SP | 45 | 10.87% | 3 | 397 | Weak |
| IND | 17 | 4.11% | 4 | 75 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.21% | 5 | 170 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.48% | 6 | 374 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 136 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 149 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 226 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 261 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.