U.P.S.KATOGHAN ROOM NO-01 PS 65
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP282 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 282 | 46.23% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 249 | 40.82% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 59 | 9.67% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 610 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 282 | 46.15% | 1 | 96 | Strong |
| SP | 249 | 40.75% | 2 | 102 | Strong |
| BSP | 59 | 9.66% | 3 | 147 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.47% | 4 | 221 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.82% | 5 | 272 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.49% | 6 | 275 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 135 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 225 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 130 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 288 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.