P.S. KATOGHAN ROOM NO-1 PS 63
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP289 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 289 | 42.13% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 253 | 36.88% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 85 | 12.39% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 14 | 2.04% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 13 | 1.90% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 12 | 1.75% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 6 | 0.87% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 0.87% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 686 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 289 | 40.65% | 1 | 85 | Strong |
| SP | 253 | 35.58% | 2 | 94 | Average |
| BSP | 85 | 11.95% | 3 | 81 | Weak |
| IND | 29 | 4.08% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| CPI | 14 | 1.97% | 5 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 1.69% | 6 | 92 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 69 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 147 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 224 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 250 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.