P.S. CHAK KATOGHAN PS 62
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP160 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 160 | 39.12% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 128 | 31.30% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 95 | 23.23% | |
| 4 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 6 | 1.47% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 6 | 1.47% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 409 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 160 | 38.83% | 1 | 262 | Average |
| SP | 128 | 31.07% | 2 | 279 | Average |
| BSP | 95 | 23.06% | 3 | 63 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.46% | 4 | 234 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.46% | 5 | 296 | Poor |
| SBU | 6 | 1.46% | 6 | 20 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.21% | 7 | 169 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 223 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 128 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.