P.S. CHITAULI PS 58
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP362 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 362 | 50.91% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 219 | 30.80% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 65 | 9.14% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 25 | 3.52% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 22 | 3.09% | |
| 6 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 711 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 362 | 50.35% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| SP | 219 | 30.46% | 2 | 145 | Average |
| BSP | 65 | 9.04% | 3 | 127 | Poor |
| CPI | 25 | 3.48% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 22 | 3.06% | 5 | 20 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.83% | 6 | 295 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.70% | 7 | 9 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.56% | 8 | 46 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 68 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 145 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.