P.S. SARSAI BUJURG ROOM NO-2 PS 55
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP427 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 427 | 58.65% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 175 | 24.04% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 83 | 11.40% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 14 | 1.92% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 5 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 728 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 427 | 57.94% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| SP | 175 | 23.74% | 2 | 210 | Weak |
| BSP | 83 | 11.26% | 3 | 84 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 1.90% | 4 | 66 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.49% | 5 | 185 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.22% | 6 | 53 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.54% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.41% | 8 | 39 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 79 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 248 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.