P.S. SARSAI BUJURG ROOM NO-1 PS 54
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP422 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 422 | 58.69% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 227 | 31.57% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 23 | 3.20% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 16 | 2.23% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 6 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 719 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 422 | 58.37% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| SP | 227 | 31.40% | 2 | 133 | Average |
| BSP | 23 | 3.18% | 3 | 280 | Poor |
| INC | 16 | 2.21% | 4 | 47 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 1.94% | 5 | 117 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 0.83% | 6 | 131 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.55% | 7 | 15 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.41% | 8 | 84 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 78 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 67 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.