P.S, KATKHERAWA KHAGA PS 50
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP248 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 248 | 36.69% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 195 | 28.85% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 180 | 26.63% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 14 | 2.07% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 10 | 1.48% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 6 | 0.89% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 6 | 0.89% | |
| 8 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 676 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 248 | 36.10% | 1 | 104 | Average |
| BJP | 195 | 28.38% | 2 | 203 | Average |
| BSP | 180 | 26.20% | 3 | 6 | Average |
| IND | 26 | 3.78% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 2.04% | 5 | 65 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 0.87% | 6 | 129 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.44% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 142 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 245 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.