P.S. KISHUNPUR PS 410
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP430 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 430 | 61.87% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 156 | 22.45% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 41 | 5.90% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 12 | 1.73% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 11 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 11 | 1.58% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 9 | 1.29% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 7 | 1.01% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.29% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 695 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 430 | 61.17% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| BJP | 156 | 22.19% | 2 | 268 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 5.83% | 3 | 217 | Poor |
| IND | 20 | 2.84% | 4 | 55 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 1.71% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| CPI | 11 | 1.56% | 6 | 34 | Poor |
| VSIP | 11 | 1.56% | 7 | 13 | Poor |
| SS | 9 | 1.28% | 8 | 4 | Poor |
| SBU | 3 | 0.43% | 9 | 73 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 112 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.