P.S. SEMRI PS 407
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP195 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 195 | 40.88% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 104 | 21.80% | |
| 3 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 73 | 15.30% | |
| 4 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 33 | 6.92% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 19 | 3.98% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.89% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 9 | 1.89% | |
| 8 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.89% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 10 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 6 | 1.26% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 6 | 1.26% | |
| 12 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.84% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 477 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 195 | 39.63% | 1 | 204 | Average |
| SP | 104 | 21.14% | 2 | 328 | Weak |
| VSIP | 73 | 14.84% | 3 | 2 | Weak |
| IND | 38 | 7.72% | 4 | 3 | Poor |
| BSP | 33 | 6.71% | 5 | 248 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.83% | 6 | 71 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.83% | 7 | 163 | Poor |
| SS | 9 | 1.83% | 8 | 3 | Poor |
| SBU | 6 | 1.22% | 9 | 26 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 227 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.