U.P.S.KHASMAU ROOM NO-2 PS 4
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP328 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 328 | 52.31% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 220 | 35.09% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 24 | 3.83% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 13 | 2.07% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 13 | 2.07% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 13 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 627 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 328 | 51.49% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| SP | 220 | 34.54% | 2 | 140 | Average |
| BSP | 24 | 3.77% | 3 | 275 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.20% | 4 | 115 | Poor |
| CPI | 13 | 2.04% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 2.04% | 6 | 76 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 0.94% | 7 | 10 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 0.63% | 8 | 36 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.47% | 9 | 33 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.31% | 10 | 55 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.