P.S. BHAIDPUR PS 393
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP174 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 174 | 51.33% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 100 | 29.50% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 41 | 12.09% | |
| 4 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 7 | 2.06% | |
| 5 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 339 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 174 | 50.43% | 1 | 212 | Strong |
| BSP | 100 | 28.99% | 2 | 61 | Average |
| BJP | 41 | 11.88% | 3 | 394 | Weak |
| IND | 15 | 4.35% | 4 | 113 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 1.16% | 5 | 269 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.16% | 6 | 337 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.29% | 7 | 322 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 401 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 404 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 400 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.