P.S. BHURCHUNI ROOM NO-1 PS 389
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP264 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 264 | 44.22% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 200 | 33.50% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 95 | 15.91% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 8 | 1.34% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 8 | 1.34% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 597 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 264 | 43.85% | 1 | 81 | Strong |
| BJP | 200 | 33.22% | 2 | 193 | Average |
| BSP | 95 | 15.78% | 3 | 66 | Weak |
| IND | 19 | 3.16% | 4 | 64 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.33% | 5 | 189 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.66% | 6 | 268 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.50% | 7 | 123 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 107 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 251 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 230 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.