P.S. BELAWAN PS 360
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP253 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 253 | 40.10% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 206 | 32.65% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 109 | 17.27% | |
| 4 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 12 | 1.90% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.43% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 8 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 9 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 6 | 0.95% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.32% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 631 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 253 | 39.53% | 1 | 96 | Average |
| BJP | 206 | 32.19% | 2 | 184 | Average |
| BSP | 109 | 17.03% | 3 | 54 | Weak |
| IND | 28 | 4.38% | 4 | 19 | Poor |
| BSCP | 12 | 1.88% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.41% | 6 | 69 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.94% | 7 | 264 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.63% | 8 | 72 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 126 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.31% | 10 | 105 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.