P.S. CHAK SHAH JAHANPUR PS 357
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP236 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 236 | 61.78% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 83 | 21.73% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 38 | 9.95% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 8 | 2.09% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 1.31% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 3 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 382 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 236 | 60.82% | 1 | 148 | Strong |
| SP | 83 | 21.39% | 2 | 356 | Weak |
| BSP | 38 | 9.79% | 3 | 227 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 3.09% | 4 | 182 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 2.06% | 5 | 187 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.77% | 6 | 302 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.26% | 7 | 216 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.26% | 8 | 220 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 393 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 396 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.