P.S. KOT ROOM NO.2 PS 354
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP302 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 302 | 66.37% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 60 | 13.19% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 21 | 4.62% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 17 | 3.74% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 14 | 3.08% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 12 | 2.64% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 8 | 1.76% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 8 | 1.76% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 7 | 1.54% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 455 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 302 | 64.12% | 1 | 72 | Strong |
| SP | 60 | 12.74% | 2 | 384 | Weak |
| IND | 31 | 6.58% | 3 | 11 | Poor |
| BSP | 21 | 4.46% | 4 | 295 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 3.61% | 5 | 43 | Poor |
| CPI | 14 | 2.97% | 6 | 10 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 1.49% | 7 | 9 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 214 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 218 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.