P.S. RATANPUR ROOM NO.2 PS 340
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP265 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 265 | 41.34% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 182 | 28.39% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 134 | 20.90% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 14 | 2.18% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 10 | 1.56% | |
| 6 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 10 | 1.56% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 7 | 1.09% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 10 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 641 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 265 | 40.71% | 1 | 78 | Strong |
| BJP | 182 | 27.96% | 2 | 225 | Average |
| BSP | 134 | 20.58% | 3 | 27 | Weak |
| IND | 32 | 4.92% | 4 | 10 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.54% | 5 | 133 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.08% | 6 | 126 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.61% | 7 | 71 | Poor |
| SBU | 3 | 0.46% | 9 | 70 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.46% | 8 | 52 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 214 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.