U.P.S. SHAHPUR HARDASPUR ROOM NO.1 PS 331
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP179 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 179 | 39.60% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 137 | 30.31% | |
| 3 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 104 | 23.01% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 16 | 3.54% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 1.33% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 452 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 179 | 39.43% | 1 | 205 | Average |
| BSP | 137 | 30.18% | 2 | 25 | Average |
| BJP | 104 | 22.91% | 3 | 337 | Weak |
| INC | 16 | 3.52% | 4 | 49 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.98% | 5 | 239 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.88% | 6 | 259 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.44% | 7 | 120 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 206 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 392 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 370 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.